Tanakh Prophecy
"My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?"
Fulfillment
"Jesus cried out with a loud voice, 'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?'"
Rabbinic Sources
"David's cry prefigures the Messiah's suffering."
Deep Dive: Cry of abandonment
Historical Context
Psalm 22, often attributed to King David, provides a poignant expression of suffering and abandonment. It is widely believed to have been composed during a time of personal crisis, possibly while David was fleeing from King Saul or during the rebellion of his son Absalom (2 Samuel 15-18). The historical context reveals a king beset by enemies, reflecting both the personal anguish of David and the broader struggles of the Israelite community facing external threats.
Archaeological evidence, such as inscriptions found in the City of David, supports the existence of significant conflict during David's reign, corroborating the themes of anguish and divine abandonment present in Psalm 22. This psalm was likely recited in communal worship, serving not only as a personal lament but also as a collective expression of Israel's suffering. The Jewish tradition recognizes that David's cries resonate with the experiences of the community, particularly in times of distress.
Textual Analysis
The opening line of Psalm 22, "My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" (אֵלִי, אֵלִי, לָמָה עֲזַבְתָּנִי), employs profound emotional and theological language. The repeated address "אֵלִי" (Eli) emphasizes an intimate relationship with God, even in the depths of despair. The verb "עֲזַבְתָּנִי" (azavtani), translated as "forsaken," implies a complete abandonment, heightening the anguish depicted in the psalm.
Translation nuances arise when considering various versions of the text. The Septuagint (LXX) translates the Hebrew "עֲזַבְתָּנִי" as "ἐγκατέλιπές με" (egkatelipes me), meaning "You have left me behind." This shift from "forsaken" to "left behind" introduces additional layers of meaning, suggesting not only abandonment but also a sense of being left to confront one's trials alone.
In contrast, more contemporary translations, such as the New International Version (NIV) and the English Standard Version (ESV), retain "forsaken," reflecting the gravity of the emotional plea while remaining faithful to the original Hebrew. These nuances are crucial for understanding the theological implications of the cry of abandonment, especially as it relates to Yeshua's experience on the cross.
Fulfillment Evidence
Matthew 27:46 captures Yeshua’s cry from the cross, "Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?" This direct quotation from Psalm 22:1 serves as a powerful testament to the fulfillment of David’s prophetic lament. Yeshua’s use of this specific phrase underscores not only His identification with human suffering but also His role as the Messianic figure who embodies the anguish foretold by David.
Historical evidence from early Christian writings provides context for understanding Yeshua’s crucifixion as a fulfillment of messianic prophecy. The Gospel narratives emphasize that Yeshua's suffering was not an isolated event but part of a divine plan foretold in the scriptures. The Dead Sea Scrolls, particularly the community's expectations of a suffering Messiah, align with this interpretation, suggesting that early Jewish thought anticipated a Messiah who would endure suffering and abandonment.
Common objections to the messianic interpretation often cite the belief that David's psalm was merely a personal lament. However, the rabbinic commentary in Midrash Tehillim 22:1 explicitly states that David's cry prefigures the Messiah's suffering, indicating a broader application of this poignant expression of despair.
Rabbinic Perspectives
Rabbinic literature provides a rich tapestry of interpretations regarding Psalm 22. The Talmud, in its discussions about the nature of the Messiah, frequently references suffering as an inherent aspect of the messianic mission. Midrash Tehillim 22:1 elucidates that David's cry not only reflects his individual suffering but also serves as a prophetic foreshadowing of the Messiah’s tribulations.
Additionally, the Targumim, Aramaic translations and interpretations of the Hebrew Bible, often emphasize the collective suffering of Israel as a nation. These texts highlight how David's lament encapsulates the experiences of the Jewish people throughout history, reinforcing the understanding of the Messiah as one who suffers alongside His people.
This rabbinic interpretation supports the notion that Yeshua’s fulfillment of Psalm 22 is not merely a historical coincidence but rather a deliberate act of divine orchestration, revealing the continuity of God’s redemptive plan through suffering.
Significance for Today
The cry of abandonment found in Psalm 22 resonates deeply with modern believers and seekers, offering a lens through which to understand suffering in the human experience. In a world marked by pain and isolation, this prophecy serves as a reminder that even in the depths of despair, one can still call out to God.
For Messianic Jews, recognizing Yeshua’s fulfillment of this prophecy enhances the understanding of His role as the Suffering Servant, who bears the weight of humanity’s anguish. This realization invites believers to engage with their own suffering in light of Yeshua’s experience, fostering a sense of hope and solidarity.
Moreover, the broader messianic narrative, encompassing themes of suffering, redemption, and the ultimate restoration of creation, underscores the importance of Psalm 22 in the biblical canon. This prophetic cry not only connects the past and the future but also serves as a source of comfort and strength for those navigating the complexities of faith and life in the present.
Two Millennia of Adversary Positions
4 eras of objections to this prophecy, with primary sources and Messianic corrections.
Abraham Ibn Ezra
Psalm 22 is David's Personal Lament, Not Messianic
"The psalmist speaks in this psalm of himself, being in great trouble, and his enemies surrounding him."
Abraham Ibn Ezra interprets Psalm 22 as a personal prayer of King David, not a prophecy about the Messiah. He argues that the psalmist is describing his own severe distress and the enemies surrounding him, grounding the text entirely in David's historical context.
IslamQA.info
Cry of Forsakenness Proves It Wasn't Jesus
"The words 'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?' which are interpreted as meaning 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?' – if they were indeed uttered by the Messiah (peace be upon him) – are an admission that he was forsaken, and one who is forsaken is not victorious."
Islamic teaching asserts that Jesus was not crucified but was raised to heaven by God, with another put on the cross in his place. Therefore, this cry of abandonment could not have been uttered by Jesus. If it were, it would signify that God had forsaken his prophet, which is seen as a sign of defeat, not victory, and is inconsistent with the status of a true Messenger of God.
Tovia Singer
Psalm 22's Speaker Expects Rescue, Unlike Jesus
"Throughout this entire chapter, the psalmist repeatedly pleads with God to rescue him from his impending death... In other words, the author of Psalm 22 fully expected to be saved from his enemies. Was Jesus saved from the cross? Obviously not. Therefore, this psalm could not be speaking about Jesus."
Tovia Singer argues that the speaker in Psalm 22 repeatedly begs God for rescue from death and fully expects to be saved from his enemies. Since Jesus was not saved from death on the cross, Singer concludes that the psalm cannot be a prophecy about him. The Christian application is seen as a distortion that ignores the plain meaning of the text.
Bart D. Ehrman
The Cry is a Literary Invention by Mark
"Mark is the one who has Jesus cry out the opening words of Psalm 22... By having Jesus say these words, Mark is indicating that he is the righteous one who is suffering, and that his enemies will ultimately be shamed for what they have done to him... It is not at all clear, in fact, that Jesus actually said these words."
Bart Ehrman proposes that the Gospel of Mark, the earliest gospel, invented the scene of Jesus crying out the words of Psalm 22. In this view, it is not a historical report of what Jesus actually said, but a literary device used by the author to portray Jesus's death as the fulfillment of scripture, casting him as the righteous sufferer of the Psalm.