Tanakh Prophecy
"In the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering."
Fulfillment
"This Man offered one sacrifice for sins forever."
Rabbinic Sources
"40 years before the Temple's destruction, the crimson thread stopped turning white."
Deep Dive: Daniel's 70 Weeks — Sacrifice and offering cease
Historical Context
The prophecy of Daniel's 70 Weeks is situated within a tumultuous historical backdrop. Written by the prophet Daniel during the Babylonian exile (circa 605-538 BCE), this prophetic text addresses the Jewish people, specifically those displaced from their homeland. The Babylonian captivity profoundly impacted the identity and religious practices of the Israelites, as they grappled with questions of divine justice and hope for restoration. Daniel's vision, found in Daniel 9, emerges as a theological anchor, promising eventual redemption and the re-establishment of the covenantal relationship between God and Israel.
The historical context is further illuminated by archaeological findings, such as the Cyrus Cylinder, which attests to the Persian decree allowing Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple around 538 BCE. This restoration was vital for the Jewish community, as it symbolized God's faithfulness to His promises. Daniel's prophecy, particularly the mention of the cessation of "sacrifice and offering" (Daniel 9:27), suggests an impending transformation in the sacrificial system, possibly foreshadowing events leading to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE.
Textual Analysis
The key phrase in Daniel 9:27, "In the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering," requires careful examination of its Hebrew components. The term "שָׁבוּעַ" (shabuwa) translates to "week," but it can also signify a period of seven years. The phrase "כָּתוֹן" (katon), meaning "to bring to an end," suggests an active cessation rather than a passive occurrence. This nuance indicates a deliberate act, hinting at a significant intervention in the sacrificial system.
Various translations, such as the Jewish Publication Society (JPS) Tanakh and the New International Version (NIV), capture these nuances differently. The JPS emphasizes the prophetic urgency with "he shall make sacrifice and offering cease," while the NIV frames it as "he will put an end to sacrifice and offering," reflecting a more definitive action. Such variations highlight the interpretive challenges surrounding this passage, particularly as they relate to messianic expectations.
Fulfillment Evidence
The New Testament presents Yeshua as the fulfillment of Daniel's prophecy, particularly in the context of His sacrificial death. In Hebrews 10:11-14, it is stated, "And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God." This passage directly connects Yeshua's atoning sacrifice to the cessation of the sacrificial system foretold in Daniel.
Historical evidence supports this connection. The destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, which was only about 40 years after Yeshua's crucifixion, marked the end of the traditional sacrificial practices. Josephus, a Jewish historian, documents the temple's destruction and the subsequent impact on Jewish worship, aligning with the prophetic declaration in Daniel. Common objections to this interpretation often cite the non-literal fulfillment of "sacrifice and offering," arguing that the sacrificial system does not cease until the Temple itself is destroyed. However, the cessation of the sacrificial system can be understood as a theological fulfillment through Yeshua's once-and-for-all sacrifice that negated the need for further offerings.
Rabbinic Perspectives
Rabbinic literature offers insightful perspectives on Daniel 9:27. The Talmud, particularly Yoma 39b, notes that "40 years before the Temple's destruction, the crimson thread stopped turning white," a reference to the supernatural sign believed to signify God's absence from the Temple following the crucifixion of Yeshua. This interpretation aligns with the cessation of divine favor upon the sacrificial system, suggesting a profound understanding of the significance of Yeshua's death within later Jewish thought.
Furthermore, Midrashic sources often reflect on the Messianic implications of Daniel's prophecy, indicating an awareness of an anticipated figure who would bring an end to the sacrificial system. While traditional rabbinic interpretations may not explicitly identify Yeshua as this figure, they do highlight the expectation of a transformative event in Israel's worship practices.
Significance for Today
The prophecy of Daniel 9:27 holds profound significance for modern believers and seekers. It encapsulates the essence of the messianic narrative, portraying Yeshua as the fulfillment of God's promises to Israel and the world. For Messianic Jews, this prophecy reinforces the belief that Yeshua's sacrificial death inaugurated a new covenant, as prophesied by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 31:31-34), which allows for direct access to God without the need for traditional sacrifices.
In a contemporary context, this prophecy serves as a call to faith, urging individuals to recognize the transformative nature of Yeshua's sacrifice and its implications for a relationship with God. As believers engage with this prophecy, they are invited to explore its rich theological dimensions and historical fulfillments, finding hope and assurance in the ongoing narrative of redemption that continues to unfold in their lives and communities.
Two Millennia of Adversary Positions
4 eras of objections to this prophecy, with primary sources and Messianic corrections.
Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra
Prophecy Refers to Antiochus IV, Not Messiah or Rome
"he will make a firm covenant. This is Antiochus, who made his covenant firm with many of those who despise the holy covenant... and he will put a stop to the sacrifice and the meal offering. for so he did."
Ibn Ezra argues that the prophecy refers to events in the Maccabean period (2nd century BCE). He identifies the ruler who stops the sacrifices not as Messiah or a Roman general, but as the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who desecrated the Second Temple and forbade Jewish sacrifices, an event that prompted the Maccabean revolt.
Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki)
Cessation of Sacrifice Refers to Roman General Titus
"And for half the week, he shall cause the sacrifice and the meal-offering to cease. And this is Titus and his armies. And for half of the last week, which is three and a half years, the sacrifice and the meal-offering shall cease because of the siege."
Rashi interprets the 'he' who stops the sacrifices not as the Messiah, but as the Roman general Titus during the siege of Jerusalem. In this view, the 'half a week' (3.5 years) refers to the duration of the Roman siege, which forcibly halted the Temple's sacrificial service leading up to its destruction in 70 CE.
Tovia Singer
The 'He' Who Stops Sacrifices is an Evil Prince, Not Jesus
"The 'he' in verse 27 is none other than the 'prince that shall come' from the previous verse. This prince is the one who will 'destroy the city and the sanctuary.' This same evil prince will 'make a firm covenant with many for one week; and for half of the week he will cause the sacrifice and the meal-offering to cease.'"
Tovia Singer asserts that the 'he' in verse 27 must be the same antecedent as the 'prince that shall come' in verse 26 who destroys the Temple. Since Jesus did not destroy the Temple, this figure must be an anti-messianic enemy of Israel, identified with the Roman general Titus. Therefore, the cessation of sacrifice is a destructive act by an evil prince, not a fulfillment by the Messiah.
Chabad.org
Final Half-Week Corresponds to the Roman Siege of Jerusalem
"The last half-week (three and a half years) mentioned in the prophecy corresponds to the period when Vespasian, the Roman emperor, came and besieged Jerusalem for three and a half years, which led to the destruction of the Temple."
Following the traditional rabbinic view espoused by Rashi, Chabad.org articles explain that the final 3.5 years ('half-week') of Daniel's prophecy correspond to the Roman siege of Jerusalem under Vespasian and Titus. This military action, culminating in the Temple's destruction in 70 CE, is what forcibly stopped the sacrifices.