Tanakh Prophecy
"One like the Son of Man, coming with the clouds of heaven."
Fulfillment
"You will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power."
Rabbinic Sources
"The Son of Man in Daniel 7 is the Messiah — pre-existent and divine."
Deep Dive: The Son of Man
Historical Context
The prophecy in Daniel 7:13–14 emerges from a tumultuous period in Jewish history, specifically during the Babylonian Exile, which lasted from 586 to 538 BCE. The Book of Daniel, traditionally attributed to the prophet Daniel, is believed to have been written during the 6th century BCE, although some scholars suggest it may have been composed in the 2nd century BCE during the Maccabean Revolt. This context is crucial because it reflects the aspirations and struggles of the Jewish people against oppressive empires, notably Babylon and later, the Seleucids.
The audience of this prophecy was the Jewish community facing persecution and longing for divine intervention. Archaeological findings, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, affirm the significance of apocalyptic literature during this period, indicating that the Jewish people sought hope and reassurance of God's sovereignty through prophetic visions.
Daniel 7 presents a vision of four beasts representing successive empires, culminating in the establishment of God's everlasting kingdom. The phrase "one like the Son of Man" signifies a distinct figure who possesses authority and dominion, marking a shift from earthly rulers to a heavenly Messiah. This shift resonates with the themes of hope and restoration prevalent in Jewish eschatology.
Textual Analysis
The Hebrew phrase "כְּבַר אֱנָשׁ" (k'var enash), translated as "one like the Son of Man," warrants careful examination. The term "אֱנָשׁ" (enash) is rooted in the concept of humanity but possesses a nuanced connotation that implies a representative or archetypal figure. The phrase "coming with the clouds of heaven" indicates a divine arrival, suggesting that this figure embodies both human and divine aspects.
Comparative translations reveal subtle differences that impact interpretation. The New American Standard Bible (NASB) translates the phrase as "like a son of man," highlighting the figure's humanity. Conversely, the English Standard Version (ESV) opts for "one like a son of man," which may suggest a more metaphorical interpretation. This distinction is critical in understanding the dual nature of the Messiah as both human and divine, a theme that is echoed in the New Testament.
The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, renders the phrase as "ομοιώματι ανθρωπου" (omoimati anthrōpou), further emphasizing the connection to humanity. This linguistic analysis underscores the complexity of the identity of the "Son of Man" and lays the groundwork for understanding Yeshua’s fulfillment of this prophecy.
Fulfillment Evidence
Yeshua's life and ministry are intricately linked to the prophetic vision presented in Daniel. In the New Testament, both Matthew 26:64 and Mark 14:62 present Yeshua asserting His identity as the "Son of Man," stating, "You will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power." This declaration occurs during His trial before the Sanhedrin, where Yeshua boldly claims His divine authority, aligning Himself with the figure prophesied in Daniel.
Historical evidence supports the notion that Yeshua’s self-identification drew from deep-rooted Jewish messianic expectations. The writings of Josephus, a first-century historian, indicate that there was widespread anticipation of a Messiah who would deliver the Jewish people from oppression. Yeshua’s crucifixion and subsequent resurrection are pivotal events that believers argue fulfill the messianic role outlined in Daniel, particularly regarding the establishment of God's eternal kingdom.
Common objections to this interpretation often stem from a rejection of Yeshua's divine nature or the belief that the fulfillment of such prophecies is yet to come. However, the claims made by Yeshua and the testimony of His followers assert that the inauguration of the kingdom began with His ministry, signifying a new understanding of messianic fulfillment.
Rabbinic Perspectives
Rabbinic literature offers rich commentary on the identity of the "Son of Man" in Daniel 7. The Talmud, particularly in Sanhedrin 98a, identifies the "Son of Man" as the Messiah, suggesting a pre-existent and divine quality. Similarly, the apocryphal text 4 Ezra 13 elaborates on the figure, portraying him as a heavenly being who brings about divine judgment. These texts reflect an early Jewish understanding that the Messiah would have a transcendent role, reinforcing the notion that Daniel's prophecy points to a figure of substantial significance.
The Targumim, Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Scriptures, also demonstrate a messianic interpretation of this passage. They highlight the expectation of a redeemer who will come in glory, emphasizing the divine authority associated with the Messiah. This rabbinic perspective aligns with the understanding of Yeshua as the fulfillment of the "Son of Man" prophecy, providing a bridge between ancient Jewish thought and early Christian interpretation.
Significance for Today
The prophecy of the "Son of Man" serves as a cornerstone for understanding the identity and nature of the Messiah within the Messianic Jewish faith. For modern believers, this prophecy underscores the continuity between the Tanakh and the New Testament, affirming that Yeshua embodies the fulfillment of ancient hopes. The dual nature of Yeshua—fully human and fully divine—provides a model for believers, emphasizing the relational aspect of faith and the hope of divine redemption.
In an era marked by uncertainty and longing for justice, the message of the "Son of Man" resonates profoundly. It assures believers that God is actively involved in human history and that the promise of restoration remains steadfast. This prophecy invites seekers to explore the depths of its implications, fostering a deeper understanding of God’s nature and His ultimate plan for humanity through the Messiah.
Two Millennia of Adversary Positions
4 eras of objections to this prophecy, with primary sources and Messianic corrections.
Babylonian Talmud (Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi)
Messiah's Arrival on Clouds is Conditional on Israel's Merit
"It is written: 'And behold, one like the Son of Man came with the clouds of heaven' (Daniel 7:13), and it is written: 'Behold, your king will come to you...lowly and riding upon a donkey' (Zechariah 9:9). This is not a contradiction: If they are meritorious, he will come with the clouds of heaven; if not, he will come lowly and riding on a donkey."
The Talmud reconciles the apparent contradiction between the Messiah coming on clouds (Daniel 7:13) and humbly on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9) by making it conditional. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi states that the manner of the Messiah's arrival depends on Israel's spiritual state: if they are meritorious, He will come in glory with the clouds; if not, He will come in humility on a donkey.
Rashi
'Son of Man' is a Symbol for the People of Israel
"one like a son of man came: This is the King Messiah. 'And came to the Ancient of Days': He reached up to Him, i.e., God brought him near to Him. 'And they brought him near': Heb. וְהִקְרְבוּהוּ. They brought him near before Him. Alternatively, 'one like a son of man' refers to Israel. They are compared to a man because of their humility, and the beasts are the kingdoms, which are compared to beasts."
Rashi interprets the 'one like a son of man' not as an individual Messianic figure, but as a collective symbol for the people of Israel. He argues that just as the four beasts represent kingdoms, this human-like figure represents the nation of Israel, who will ultimately receive dominion from God after suffering under the gentile empires. The 'coming with clouds' signifies God's swift redemption of them.
Tovia Singer
'Bar Enash' Simply Means 'Human Being' and Symbolizes Israel
"The 'one like a son of man' in Daniel’s vision is not the messiah, but rather a metaphor for the nation of Israel... In Daniel’s vision, the Jewish people are depicted as 'one like a son of man' because they are contrasted with the gentile nations of the world who are portrayed as wild, rapacious beasts. The Jewish people, therefore, are the 'son of man' who will receive the kingdom from the 'Ancient of Days' in the end of days."
Tovia Singer argues that the Aramaic phrase 'bar enash' simply means 'a human being' and is not a special title. He contends that the figure is a metaphor for the 'saints of the Most High' (Daniel 7:18), representing the nation of Israel, who will receive the kingdom after the destruction of the oppressive empires. The 'Son of Man' is thus a collective, not an individual, and certainly not a divine being.
Bart Ehrman
Jesus' 'Son of Man' Sayings are a Later Christian Invention
"In the book of Daniel, the Son of Man is not a divine being, but a symbol for the saints of the Most High... Jesus himself may not have called himself the Son of Man in the divine sense. It is more likely that he predicted the coming of a future cosmic judge, the Son of Man, but that he did not mean himself. Later Christians, after his death, came to believe that Jesus was this Son of Man."
Bart Ehrman posits that the historical Jesus likely did not refer to himself as the divine 'Son of Man' from Daniel 7. He argues that while Jesus may have spoken of a future cosmic judge called the 'Son of Man,' he saw this figure as separate from himself. The Gospel passages where Jesus explicitly identifies himself as this glorious figure (especially during his trial) are seen as later theological developments by the Christian community to elevate Jesus' status.