Are You Out of Sync? – Gathering of Christ Church
This article exposes how the 'Gathering of Christ Church' and similar Black Hebrew Israelite (BHI) groups promote doctrines that are out of sync with Yeshua's original Hebraic-Messianic faith. We dismantle their lineage claims and misapplication of scripture.
Quick Answer
Are You Out of Sync? – Gathering of Christ Church: Exposing BHI Deviations Quick Answer Quick Answer: The "Gathering of Christ Church" and similar Black Hebrew Israelite (BHI) groups are out of sync with the original Hebraic-Messianic faith of Yeshua, promoting lineage claims and interpretations of scripture that deviate from primary sources. Their doctrines, rooted…
Are You Out of Sync? – Gathering of Christ Church: Exposing BHI Deviations
Quick Answer
Quick Answer: The "Gathering of Christ Church" and similar Black Hebrew Israelite (BHI) groups are out of sync with the original Hebraic-Messianic faith of Yeshua, promoting lineage claims and interpretations of scripture that deviate from primary sources. Their doctrines, rooted in late 19th-century American movements, contradict the Torah-observant, inclusive message of Messiah and the apostles, who preached a faith open to all nations grafted into Israel through Yeshua.
The Scholarly Case
The authentic faith of Yeshua HaMashiach, as practiced by the first-century apostles, was deeply rooted in the Torah and the Prophets, an inherently Hebraic expression of devotion to YHWH. This faith did not propagate a new racial or ethnic identity, but rather invited all, regardless of background, to be grafted into the commonwealth of Israel through Messiah Yeshua, as articulated by Rav Sha'ul (Paul) in Romans 11:17-24. The concept of a distinct "Christian" identity, separate from the Jewish root, only fully emerged later, with the term "Christian" first being applied to believers in Antioch (Acts 11:26), a significant geographic and cultural distance from Jerusalem, the heartland of Yeshua's ministry. This shift marked the beginning of a gradual departure from the original Hebraic understanding.
The core of Yeshua's teaching affirmed the enduring validity of the Torah, stating He came not to abolish but to fulfill (Matthew 5:17). This fulfillment meant living out the Torah's righteous requirements through the Spirit, not nullifying them. The Sabbath, for instance, remains a divine command (Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:12-15), a shadow pointing to Messiah (Colossians 2:16-17), not an abolished relic. The apostles, including Sha'ul, continued to observe the Sabbath and the biblical feasts, demonstrating that adherence to these practices was consistent with faith in Yeshua. The idea that these commands were abrogated for Gentile believers is a later theological construct, not a first-century apostolic teaching.
Furthermore, the Messianic hope, as understood in the Tanakh and by Yeshua's followers, was never tied to a specific racial or ethnic group in an exclusionary manner. Genesis 49:10 clearly prophesies the scepter remaining with Judah until Shiloh (Messiah) comes, indicating a Jewish lineage for Messiah, not a racial exclusivity for salvation. Indeed, the prophecy in Isaiah 2:2-3 and Micah 4:1-2 declares that "all nations will stream" to Jerusalem to learn YHWH's ways, clearly indicating an inclusive, universal scope for the Messianic era. Galatians 3:28-29 unequivocally states, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise." This is a profound statement against any form of racial or ethnic exclusivity in the Body of Messiah.
The concept of compound unity, inherent in the Hebrew word echad (Deuteronomy 6:4), is crucial for understanding the nature of Elohim and the unity of the Body of Messiah. Just as echad describes the husband and wife becoming "one flesh" (Genesis 2:24) or a "one cluster" of grapes (Numbers 13:23), it speaks to a plurality within unity. This Hebraic understanding of Elohim (Genesis 1:26, "Let Us make man in Our image") stands in stark contrast to later Hellenistic philosophical interpretations of the Godhead, which often led to rigid, non-Hebraic formulations. The original faith saw a unified Elohim expressed in diverse ways, including the Memra (Word) in Targum Onkelos and Jonathan, anticipating the coming of Yeshua.
The claim by certain groups that they are the "true" Israelites based on racial criteria, often linked to the curses of Deuteronomy 28, fundamentally misunderstands the nature of biblical prophecy and covenant. The curses in Deuteronomy 28 describe national exile and suffering for disobedience, not a racial marker for a specific modern group. Genetic studies, such as those by Behar et al. (2010) in "The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people," demonstrate a clear Levantine origin for self-identifying Jewish populations (Sephardic, Mizrahi, Ashkenazi), directly contradicting claims of a purely African lineage for all "true" Israelites. The Messianic vision is about spiritual lineage through Yeshua, not an exclusive racial one. The original Hebraic faith was about covenant loyalty to YHWH, manifested through Torah and faith in Messiah, not racial purity tests.
Adversary Teardown: Israel United in Christ (IUIC)
The "Gathering of Christ Church" and similar Black Hebrew Israelite (BHI) factions, such as Israel United in Christ (IUIC) and Sicarii Israelites, propagate doctrines that are fundamentally out of sync with the original Hebraic-Messianic faith. Their core deviation lies in the assertion that modern-day African Americans are the sole, true descendants of the biblical Israelites, a claim often supported by a misapplication of the curses in Deuteronomy 28.
This tradition did not originate in antiquity but is a relatively recent phenomenon, traceable to the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States. Key figures in its denominational lineage include Frank Cherry, who founded the Church of God in 1886, William Saunders Crowdy with his Church of God and Saints of Christ in 1896, and Wentworth Arthur Matthew, who established the Commandment Keepers in 1919. These movements arose in specific socio-historical contexts, largely disconnected from the continuous lineage of Jewish communities throughout history. They represent a significant departure from both normative Judaism and the first-century Messianic movement, which never predicated salvation or Israelite identity on a specific racial phenotype.
IUIC, for instance, often asserts that the curses of Deuteronomy 28 apply exclusively to African Americans, thereby identifying them as the "true" Israelites. This interpretation ignores the historical context of these curses, which describe the consequences of national disobedience leading to exile, experienced by Jewish communities across various diasporas for millennia. The curses were fulfilled in the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Roman exiles, affecting all Israel, not just one specific group. To claim these curses as a racial identifier for a particular modern demographic is to twist scripture for a nationalist agenda, rather than to understand it within its covenantal framework. The genetic evidence from scholarly studies, such as "The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people" by Behar et al. (2010), directly contradicts these exclusive racial claims, demonstrating the Levantine origins of diverse Jewish populations.
Furthermore, these groups often dismiss the universal call of the Gospel, which invites all people to become Abraham's seed through faith in Yeshua (Galatians 3:28-29). They replace this inclusive, spiritual grafting (Romans 11:17-24) with a narrow, exclusionary racial doctrine. This is a profound theological fault line that separates them from the apostolic teaching.
Another area where some BHI groups, including the "Gathering of Christ Church," may find themselves "out of sync" is in their approach to the biblical calendar. Some factions, like Almond House Fellowship, promote the idea that the confusion regarding the calendar will only be resolved upon Yeshua's return, suggesting He will "realign all our calendars" (as promoted in "The True New Year is in Spring! 🐑🌒"). This is a speculative claim not directly supported by scripture and serves as an excuse to avoid diligent study and adherence to YHWH's established times and seasons (such as those discussed by 119 Ministries in "Calendar Chaos What to Do" or "Time the Foundation Part 1"). The expectation of a future realignment defers present obedience, rather than seeking to discern and follow YHWH's commands now, as the first followers of Yeshua did.
Counter-Arguments Anticipated
Objection 1: The term "Christian" implies a new religion, separate from Judaism.
This objection misunderstands the historical development. While the term "Christian" emerged (Acts 11:26), it initially described followers of Yeshua who were primarily Jewish and Torah-observant. The separation into a distinct religion, "Christianity," was a gradual process influenced by post-apostolic Greek-speaking commentators who drifted from the Hebraic root, often integrating Hellenistic philosophy and Roman political structures. The original movement was a Jewish sect, not a new religion, continuing the covenantal story of Israel through Messiah Yeshua, as taught by First Fruits of Zion in "Recovering Covenant Identity and the Biblical Calendar."
Objection 2: Deuteronomy 28 is proof of the identity of the true Israelites today.
This claim is a misapplication of prophecy. The curses in Deuteronomy 28 describe national judgment and exile for disobedience, not a racial identifier for a specific modern ethnic group. These curses were fulfilled repeatedly throughout Jewish history, notably in the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Roman exiles, affecting all of Israel. They do not exclusively point to any single modern racial group. Furthermore, such an interpretation ignores the promises of restoration and the inclusive nature of the Messianic covenant, which grafts all who believe in Yeshua into Abraham's seed, regardless of their physical lineage (Galatians 3:28-29).
Objection 3: Paul abolished the Law, so Torah observance is unnecessary.
This is a common misreading of Rav Sha'ul's (Paul's) letters. Paul consistently affirmed the Torah, stating he did not nullify it but established it (Romans 3:31). His writings clarify that salvation is by grace through faith, not by works of the Law, but this does not negate the Law as YHWH's righteous instruction for living. Colossians 2:16-17 states, "Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a feast, a New Moon, or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the body that casts it belongs to Christ." This verse indicates that these practices are still relevant shadows pointing to Messiah, not abolished commands. Yeshua Himself declared He did not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets (Matthew 5:17).
Position Lock
Position Lock: The authentic Messianic faith, rooted in the Torah and Yeshua's teachings, unequivocally rejects racial exclusivity for Israelite identity and affirms that all who trust in Yeshua are grafted into Abraham's covenant. Claims of specific racial groups being the "true" Israelites, based on late 19th-century traditions and misinterpretations of Deuteronomy 28, are unscriptural deviations from the original Hebraic-Messianic faith.