GOCC

How misused: Interpreted as prophesying Kanye West's antisemitic statements as divinely inspired to provoke jealousy in a 'foolish nation' (modern Jews/white people) by identifying Black people as true Israelites.

Scripture's answer: Romans 10:19 quotes Deuteronomy 32:21 where God states He will provoke Israel to jealousy 'by those who are not a nation' and 'by a foolish nation'. Paul uses this to show that Israel's rejection of the Messiah was foretold, and that God would extend salvation to Gentiles. The context is not about specific modern ethnic groups or contemporary figures' controversial remarks, but about God's sovereign plan to save all who believe, both Jew and Gentile (Romans 10:12-13).

How misused: Misinterpreted to characterize critics or those who disagree with their doctrine as 'demon-possessed dogs and swine,' justifying the withholding of 'holy' truths from them.

Scripture's answer: Matthew 7:6 warns against sharing sacred truths with those who would deliberately profane or trample upon them, comparing them to 'dogs' and 'pigs.' It is a warning about discerning audiences and protecting sacred things from profanation, not a license to label critics as demon-possessed or to excuse one's own lack of engagement with legitimate theological questions. The passage emphasizes discernment, not personal condemnation for disagreement.

How misused: Misinterpreted to exclude Gentiles from 'his own' who receive Christ, implying it refers exclusively to the 'lost sheep of Israel' (as defined by BHI) and that Gentile inclusion is a 'heretical way'.

Scripture's answer: John 1:11 states, 'He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him.' This refers to Jesus coming to the Jewish people as a whole, from whom he was descended and to whom the covenant promises were made. The following verse, John 1:12, clearly states, 'But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God,' making it clear that belief, not ethnic identity, is the condition for becoming a child of God. The New Testament consistently teaches that salvation is available to all, Jew and Gentile, through faith in Christ (Galatians 3:28).

How misused: Redefined 'hate' to allow for animosity towards family members who are perceived to be operating against Christ or their specific BHI doctrine, rather than understanding it as a comparative statement about prioritizing Christ above all else.

Scripture's answer: Luke 14:26 states, 'If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.' This is hyperbole, a figure of speech indicating that allegiance to Christ must be supreme, even over the most cherished human relationships. It does not command literal animosity or hatred, but rather a realignment of priorities where love for Christ far surpasses all other loves. The correction is that this verse does not justify literal hatred or shunning of family members, but emphasizes supreme devotion to Yeshua.

How misused: Misinterpreted as a literal prophecy promoting polygamy for Black Israelite men during a time of demographic collapse, rather than a prophecy of judgment and a desperate situation for women in Judah.

Scripture's answer: Isaiah 4:1 is a prophecy of judgment against Judah and Jerusalem. It describes a future time of severe population decline and male casualties in war, so much so that seven women will vie for one man, offering to provide for themselves, solely to remove their reproach of childlessness and spinsterhood. It is a description of a desperate situation resulting from divine judgment, not a divine mandate or justification for polygamy. The context is a consequence of sin and war, not a sanctioned social structure.

How misused: Misinterpreted to suggest that post-baptismal spiritual struggles are indicative of 'seven other spirits' entering a person who 'broke' their agreement, turning baptism into a contractual agreement rather than a covenant of grace.

Scripture's answer: Matthew 12:43-45 describes an unclean spirit leaving a person, only to return with seven others worse than itself if the 'house' (the person's spiritual state) remains empty and swept clean but not filled with good things (i.e., new spiritual life and the Holy Spirit). This passage warns against a superficial cleansing without true spiritual transformation and filling by God. It is not primarily about breaking a 'baptismal agreement' but about the danger of spiritual vacuum and the need for genuine regeneration and indwelling by the Holy Spirit. Baptism is an outward sign of an inward grace, not a magical contract that can be 'broken' to invite more demons than before.

How misused: Interpreted to mean that women's salvation is linked to physical childbearing, 'remaining in faith, charity, and holiness with sobriety'.

Scripture's answer: 1 Timothy 2:15 states, 'Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.' This is one of the most debated verses in the New Testament. Interpretations vary, but none link a woman's individual salvation to the physical act of childbearing as a works-based requirement. Common interpretations suggest salvation is found through 'the Childbearing' (referring to Christ's birth), or that women find their 'salvation/protection' from reproach through their God-given role in family and society, providing they also continue in faith, love, and holiness. It is not a means to earn salvation, but rather describes a blessed life or preservation within God's design for women. Salvation remains by grace through faith in Christ alone.

How misused: Misinterpreted as a literal description of Satan's pre-creation fall from an earthly Eden and his role in deceiving Adam and Eve, rather than a metaphorical lamentation against the King of Tyre's pride.

Scripture's answer: Ezekiel 28:11-19 is primarily a lamentation against the King of Tyre, condemning his pride and ambition. While some theological traditions see an allegorical connection to Satan's fall due to the king's self-exaltation (e.g., 'you were in Eden, the garden of God'), it is not a literal, historical account of Satan's pre-creation fall from an earthly Eden, nor does it describe him as the serpent in Genesis 3. Such interpretations blend metaphorical language with literal historical claims, obscuring the primary message against human pride.